No, not Hugo …

No no. Hugo
I’ve been using Hugo to power a part of a website for quite a while now. Since 2015 I’ve had a static site, a simple library, with around 2000 posts that I wanted to be a static, less-possible-to-be-hackable site. It’s purpose was to be an encyclopedia, and as a Hugo powered site, it works amazingly.
But… I do use WordPress, and sometimes I want to link and embed.
Integrations Are Queen
It helps to have a picture of how I built things. Back in *cough* 1995, the site was a single HTML page. By 1996 it was a series of SHTML (yeah) with a manually edited gallery. Fast-forward to 2005 and we have a gallery in the thousands and a full blown wiki.
Now. Never once did I have integrated logins. While I love it for the ease of … me, I hate it from a security standpoint. Today, the blog is powered by WordPress and the gallery by NetPhotoGraphics and the ‘wiki’ by Hugo (I call it a library now). Once in a while I’ll post articles or transcripts or recaps over on the library and I want to cross link to the blog to tell people “Hey! New things!”
But… from a practical standpoint, what are the options?
- A plain ol’ link
- A ‘table’ list of articles/transcripts/etc by name with links
- oEmbed
Oh yes. Option 3.
oEmbed and Hugo is Complex
Since Hugo is a static HTML generator, you have to create faux ‘endpoints’ and you cannot make a dynamic JSON generator per post. Most of the things you’ll find when you google for oEmbed and Hugo is how to make it read oEmbed (like “adding a generic oEmbed handler for Hugo“). I wanted the other way, so I broke down what I needed to do:
- Make the ‘oembed’ JSON
- Make the returning iframe
- Add the link/alternate tag to the regular HTML
Unlike with NetPhotoGraphics, wherein I could make a single PHP file which generated the endpoints and the json and the iframe, I had to approach it from a different angle with Hugo, and ask myself “How do I want the ‘endpoints’ to look?
See you actually can make a pseudo endpoint of example.com/json/link/to/page
which would generate the iframe from example.com/link/to/page
and then example.com/oembed/link/to/page
but this comes with a weird cost. You will actually end up having multiple folders on your site, and you’d want to make an .htaccess
to block things.
This has to do with how Hugo (and most static site generators) make pages. See if I wanted to make a page for ‘about’, then I would go into /posts/
and make a file called about.md
with the right headers. But that doesn’t make a file called about.html
, it actually makes a folder in my public_html
director, called about
with a file in there named index.html
— that’s basic web directory stuff, though.
But Hugo has an extra trick, which allows you to make custom files. Most people use it to make AMP pages and they explain the system like this:
A page can be output in as many output formats as you want, and you can have an infinite amount of output formats defined as long as they resolve to a unique path on the file system. In the above table, the best example of this is
AMP
vs.HTML
.AMP
has the valueamp
forPath
so it doesn’t overwrite theHTML
version; e.g. we can now have both/index.html
and/amp/index.html
.
Except… your ‘unique path’ doesn’t have to be a path! And you can customize it to kick out differently named files. So instead of /index.html
and /amp/index.html
I could do /index-amp.html
in the same location.
So that means my options were:
- A custom folder (and subfolders) for every post per ‘type’ of output
- Subfiles in the already existing folder
I picked the second and here’s how:
Output Formats
The secret sauce for Hugo is making a new set of output formats.
outputFormats:
iframe:
name: "iframe"
baseName: "iframe"
mediaType: "text/html"
isHTML: true
oembed:
name: "oembed"
baseName: "oembed"
mediaType: "application/json"
isPlainText: true
By omitting the path value and telling it that my baseName is iframe
and oembed
, I’m telling Hugo not to make a new folder, but to rename the files! Instead of making /oembed/index.html
and /oembed/about/index.html
I’m making /about/oembed.html
!
Boom.
The next trick was to tell Hugo what ‘type’ of content should use those new formats:
outputs:
home: [ "HTML", "JSON", "IFRAME", "OEMBED" ]
page: [ "HTML", "IFRAME", "OEMBED" ]
section: [ "HTML", "IFRAME", "OEMBED" ]
Home also has a JSON which is something I use for search. No one else needs it.
New Template Files
I’ll admit, this took me some trial and error. In order to have Hugo generate the right files, and not just a copy of the main index, you have to add new template files. Remember those basenames?
index.oembed.json
index.iframe.html
Looks pretty obvious, right? The iframe file is the HTML for the iframe. The oembed is the JSON for oembed discovery. Those go right into the main layouts
folder of your theme. But… I ended up having to duplicate things in order to get everything working and that meant I also made:
/_default/baseof.iframe.html
/_default/baseof.oembed.json
/_default/single.iframe.html
/_default/single.json
Now, if you;’re wondering “Why is it named single.json
?” I don’t know. What I know is if I named it any other way, I got this error:
WARN: found no layout file for “oembed” for layout “single” for kind “page”: You should create a template file which matches Hugo Layouts Lookup Rules for this combination.
So I did that and it works. I also added in these:
/section/section.iframe.html
/section/section.oembed.json
Since I make heavy use of special sections, that was needed.
The Template Files
They actually all look pretty much the same.
There’s the oembed JSON:
{
"version": "1.0",
"provider_name": "{{ .Site.Title }}",
"provider_url": "{{ .Site.BaseURL }}",
"type": "rich",
"title": "{{ .Title }} | {{ .Site.Title }}",
"url": "{{ .Permalink }}",
"author_name": "{{ if .Params.author }}{{ .Params.author }}{{ else }}Anonymous{{ end }}",
"html": "<iframe src=\"{{ .Permalink }}iframe.html\" width=\"600\" height=\"200\" title=\"{{ .Title }}\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"hugo-embedded-content\"></iframe>"
}
And there’s the iframe HTML:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en-US" class="no-js">
<head>
<title>{{ .Title }} · {{ .Site.Title }}</title>
<base target="_top" />
<style>
{{ partial "oembed.css" . | safeCSS }}
</style>
<meta name="robots" content="noindex, follow"/>
<link rel="canonical" href="{{ .Permalink }}" />
</head>
<body class="hugo hugo-embed-responsive">
<div class="hugo-embed">
<p class="hugo-embed-heading">
<a href="{{ .Permalink }}" target="_top">{{ .Title }}</a>
</p>
<div class="hugo-embed-excerpt">
{{ .Summary }}...
</div>
<div class="hugo-embed-footer">
<div class="hugo-embed-site-title">
<a href="{{ .Site.BaseURL }}" target="_top">
<img src="/images/oembed-icon.png" width="32" height="32" alt="{{ .Site.Title }}" class="hugo-embed-site-icon"/>
<span>{{ .Site.Title }}</span>
</a>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Note: I set summaryLength: 10
in my config to limit the summary to something manageable. And no, you’re not mis-reading that, the library generally has no images.
And then in my header code for the ‘normal’ html pages:
{{ if not .Params.notoembed }}
{{ "<!-- oEmbed -->" | safeHTML }}
<link rel="alternate" type="application/json+oembed" href="{{ .Permalink }}/oembed.json"/>
{{ end }}
I wanted to leave a way to say certain pages were non embeddable, and while I’m not using it at the moment, the logic remains.
Does it Float Work?
Of course!

Nice, quick, to the point.