If you’ve heard me answer the question “Why is this a plugin and not in core?” then you’ve probably heard me say “It’s better for WordPress to be extendable than to include everything.” And you’ve certainly heard me tell folks that the concept of Open Source development is different than many of you think.
One of the many reasons I liked WordPress was that, unlike other apps, I didn’t have to spend the first week after install turning off a great number of features that I didn’t want, just to have the core application that I did want. WordPress stood apart by assuming very little. You want to publish content. That’s pretty much it in the beginning. As things changed with the times, comments and media uploading were added, but at it’s heart, WordPress has remained pretty on point.
Simplicity.
WordPress doesn’t want to get in the way of your content. It would rather make decisions, not options, to keep it simple. We constantly argue about better ways to simplify, how we can remove options to improve usability, how we can make things easier and faster.
Earlier this month, my friend George ruminated on decisions and specifically talked about how to make his code serve two masters:
To each according to their needs. Typical users need a simple, smooth, classy interface. Power users need to get under the hood. Why try to make something that doesn’t work well for either by trying to serve both?
This is the route WordPress tries to take, and it has some pretty incredible payoffs. If you don’t need to get under that hood, your site is lean, fast, and perfect. If you do, you can totally monkey with your engine all you want to make changes. But that user who has no idea what we mean when we say “add a filter to the output…” doesn’t have to learn anything new. They can just install a plugin and go.
By being extendable, WordPress is able to keep itself small and let you make the decision of what you need. It also lets you pick out what’s important to you, and this is a hard choice. We want a lot of bells and whistles on our sites, but we know they’ll possibly make things slow. We have to decide what we care about more, what can we sacrifice, and what must we keep.
So when I tell people “It’s better that WordPress is extendable.” I do so understanding that I put the work on you, and not core. I’m making you do the hard part, the part of weighing options and features. The part of telling a client “No” because that awesome slider will make their page slow. I’m putting you on the spot.
I think that may be why people get made about this whole thing, more so than the trials and tribulations of finding the right plugin. Of course finding a good plugin that won’t break is hard. You should be circumspect about plugins and themes, test them well, don’t just use them because they’re super pretty. But here I am saying that we’re lazy, over in WordPress land, and we want you to decide what you need.
Many of you use smartphones. Many of you buy in-app purchases. Many of you, like me, think that in-app purchases are kind of a terrible thing. Thomas Baekdal goes a step further and argues they are destroying the gaming industry. Many people argue WordPress does the same thing. The core is free and the add-ons may be free or they may cost money. Heck, I paid for this theme, it’s parent theme, and some plugins!
Let’s take Easy Digital Downloads, a plugin I use. It’s free. I have six specific add-on plugins for it, though to do things I want. One I wrote, three are free, and two I paid more for. Why is that okay? Because unlike the model of paying to speed things up, EDD lets me pay to add what I NEED. I needed a PayPal alternative (PayPal is free by the way), so I bought Stripe for my users who can’t use PayPal. I wanted (not needed) a way to let people pick prices in some places, so I decided to buy that as well. But everything else has been free. That’s nothing like the In-App payments, that’s what they wanted to be but didn’t manage.
So it’s better to extend because I decide what I want, and I decide where to spend money, and I decide what to do. WordPress without those extensions? Still works. There are hundreds of options to do what I did totally for free, legally and morally free of implications too. I paid for the speed and connivence, but I didn’t have to worry about things I didn’t want or need because I didn’t add them.
I like the place where I decide what I need.
First, don’t type angry. It’s okay to type while you’re mad, but if you’re like me, and your skin heats up when you’re angry and you get all green and violent (I type really loudly), it’s probably a good moment to step back and think about why you’re angry. After all, GPL says this is allowed, right? I get mad because of perceived ownership. It’s one of my things. You should never claim to be something you’re not and you shouldn’t sell something that isn’t yours.
Boy this got complicated. But if I ping you and say “Hey, bro, not cool.” and you ignore me, or tell me to sod off, I’ll come back and ping your webhost. “Hi, this guy is stealing my content. I asked him nicely to stop. Here’s a copy of our conversation.” I should note, none of the times I’ve ever had to do this have gotten past this step. The hosts have always stepped in, poked the perpetrator, and that was that. The times I was the bad guy (reprinting news articles), the content owners have only ever had to ask me to take it down. It’s never gotten past me.
Tunnel vision is something that happens to all of us. We look at the world from our perspective (yes, I was Captain Obvious there, I know), which means when most people remark that a project needs something, what they really mean is they need it. This is the part of passion that escalates into angry and vitriol remarkably fast, by the way, so if you’ve ever seen someone go from zero to abusive in three comments, that’s often what’s going on. They really want something to the point that they see red and can’t get out of their tunnel.
If you’re stuck between writing code you like to do a feature you want and writing code someone else wants and you don’t have an investment in, you’re probably going to do what you want. This is the reason that’s hardest to understand, and it’s the one most people call ‘unprofessional’ because it boils down to “Oh you don’t like something so you’re not doing it?” If this was iOS or MS Word, yeah, you’d get fired. But this is Open Source, and the rules are a little different here. We make what we make out of that same passion you have to see what you want to see.
Oh, in the short term they’re helping you by giving you something for free. They’re getting you further in your site development than ever before. However that help ends at the provisioning level, because you aren’t paying for support from these resellers, you’re paying for product. That’s okay, so long as you know what you’re paying for, and a lot of people don’t. If people did know what they were paying for, they wouldn’t use nulled themes with base64 backdoors in them.
So back to this whole “I’ll take your paid software and give it away” thing.
