Today’s question comes from a Slack DM tossed my way about learning and possibly discarding Jekyll.
Don’t you think you’re wasting your time learning all these nonWordPress things?
Nope! Every single thing I’ve learned and discarded has improved my skill set.
Let’s take MediaWiki. Learning that taught me templating in a way that I never would have understood in WordPress. It also taught me about the perils of your ‘own’ language instead of HTML. While I’ve come to like Markdown, you still have to know HTML to make Markdown really work, because you need to understand what it is you’re writing.
And Jekyll? I learned a lot about importing and exporting data between ‘languages’ that don’t like each other. I also learned a lot about deployment of static content. Anything but FTP, right? Jekyll had me writing my own deployment scripts.
Now that I’m looking at Hugo, really not much has changed. I’ve learned GoLang, which is not all that different from things I already knew. But it’s expanding how I think about the logic structures. Hugo’s got an up on Jekyll in a lot of ways, like how easy it is to make loops for traditional blogs. Also it can handle remote JSON a little better, which sets me up for what’s next.
You see, all of this work, all this learning, is going to come back to WordPress.
What I want to do is manage my site in WordPress and have that output the JSON (via that awesome new JSON API I’ve been learning), which will in turn be dynamically called when I want to build my static HTML site.
For sites you’re not updating daily, or even weekly, this might be the magic you need. Everyone writes on WordPress. Someone has a command (or even a script) to run that collects everything from JSON and dumps it to Hugo, which generates the site for you to proof and then push.
Version controlling the content.
Let the users write in Wordpress while you bask in the glory of your static site that is, pretty much, unhackable as a CMS. I mean… what are you going to do to my HTML?
That’s what the email reply I got was. It had started innocently enough. Someone asked how to set up Multisite. I linked them to the article and sent them a free copy of my ebook WordPress Multisite 101.
He emailed back asking again how to to it and I replied that he needed to read the link and the ebook and, if he had a specific question, to ask, but otherwise, those two items were what I could do for him at the time. He wasn’t a customer, a client, or even a friend. He was barely a friend of a friend of a friend. There was no social contract or legal one. He was basically someone who asked a question.
Seven emails later and a very angry chain, he finally explained that he had already activated Multisite, before the initial emails, and it was broken. He could no longer log in and, damn it, he didn’t actually WANT multisite. So I explained he needed to un-do Multisite, showed him where (in the ebook, and via a link) he could get directions on that.
And that overwhelmed him.
Now at this point, my friend who introduced him to me apologized and said he’d explain to the guy what ‘taking advantage of someone’s kindness’ meant.
While I do feel sad that I overwhelmed someone and that he was in over his head, I don’t feel any guilt for not providing hands on help like that. There’s a limit to how much ‘freebie’ you can throw out into the world, and this fellow was not being very clear about what his actual situation was. If it had started with “I accidentally set up Multisite. How do I undo it?” I would have given him a quick set of directions with a note of “If editing the DB is too complicated for you, you’ll need to hire someone.”
There is no shame in hiring someone when you’re overwhelmed.
When you’re in over your head, you will make bad assumptions, get lost, and make expensive mistakes. If you think someone is expensive before you start your own demolition and plumbing, imagine how much the cost will be when they have to fix what you did to yourself? Websites are pretty much the same way. It’s the nature of the service industry really. You’re trying to perform a service on your own instead of paying an expert. If you get it right, awesome, you’ve learned new things and have a new skill! If not, you pay more.
But that’s actually why I think it’s okay to overwhelm someone sometimes. When you give them a large amount of data, if they’re willing to learn and concentrate, then they can learn not only about a process but about themselves. The issue isn’t the data dump but how we react to it.
When you’re overwhelmed, and believe me I’ve been there too, you have to take the elephant one bite at a time. You didn’t know how to drive a car perfectly the first time you sat in one. You couldn’t ride a bike from day one. You won’t be able to do anything 100% correctly out of the gate unless you’re a savant. Most of us aren’t.
Perfection is the enemy of progress, though. If we all wait until we’re perfect, we’ll never get anywhere.
It’s alright to be overwhelmed. It’s not alright (though certainly understandable) to let that prevent you from making progress.
Be overwhelmed. At if, in that moment, you learn one thing, then you’ve made progress.
Kenny flatters me (though I think have better hair than Trump) asking this:
If I wanted to be a millionaire, I’d ask Donald Trump, which is why I’m asking you…What would you recommend as a learning path or in specific resources to gain foundational knowledge and expertise in WP/ hosting? Knowing what you know now and if you had to start from the beginning today, what would you do? Thank you.
The same place I did when I started.
I would download WordPress, install it, and use it every day for a while. Understanding how to use the product tells you more about how it works than almost anything else. All problems you have will, eventually be traced back down to code if that’s how your inclined, or documentation, or just plain understanding.
See, how I got good at WordPress was because I used it, I had problems, and I decided to learn how to fix it instead of relying on the kindness of strangers. If I had to do it all over again, I’d do it the same way because it let me learn at my own pace and in my own way. WordPress was a place where I could (and still can) sit and study how and why things work, ask questions, get answers, and learn from them.
How did I learn about hosting? Same way. I had problems and I asked my host. “This code I want to use says it needs PHP 5 and my server is PHP 4. How do I change that?” It was really that simple. They moved me to a new server for PHP 5 and I looked up why that was necessary. That was how I learned what a nightmare server upgrades are and why they’re so complex.
The secret to it all is I never said “It should be easy to…”
Weird secret, right? Well, how many times have you heard someone say “It should be easy to fix this problem!”
It’s not. It never is. If it was, we’d be done. It’s always hard or weird or prone to conflicts, which is why that wasn’t a statement I made. Instead I asked myself “Why isn’t this easy?” I wanted to know what made things hard.
But I’m blessed with a natural curiosity about the world and I want to dig into things to see why they do what they do. This is especially true when I’m trying to use them and they, for whatever reason, don’t do what I want. That spurs me forward into research and reading and understanding and then writing. Eventually I get to the coding part. Because isn’t that how we all learned in the beginning? We wondered and we played and we learned by doing and experiencing.
If I did it all over I’d do it the same way and use the heck out of WordPress.
I’m not a math teacher. I’m not a mathematician. My father, the risk analyst, is a mathematician. We used to play math ‘games’ and I thought that was normal. I was also a very odd child. My mother was convinced something was ‘wrong’ with me because I did “Number Roll” all day at school for the better part of a year. To anyone not from a Montessori school, Number Roll is a bewildering concept, where you just write numbers, incrementing by one, over and over and over again, getting the numbers as high as you could go.
Now, I was always (am still) a hands on learner. Being forced to learn anything by rote memorization is painful. But math is a little different. You can’t ‘understand’ math until you’ve mastered counting. You can’t grasp all the relationships between quantities and numbers without knowing the numbers first. It’s like you can’t learn spelling until you memorized the ABCs.
Number roll is crazy basic. On long sheets of paper, I wrote each number in order, beginning with “1”. I should stress, my mom worried about my intelligence, that I spent days and weeks and months doing this. But what I was really doing was following patterns without knowing it. I mean, I can do my nine-times tables because I know the ‘pattern’ is Plus Minus. Watch:
09
18
27
36
That didn’t make any sense to you? Start with 09. Add 1 to the left and subtract one from the right. Now it’s 18. You do this over and over and over again and it works all the way down. This repetition taught me pattern recognition in a different way and gave me insight into both counting and the meaning behind it. The nines work like that because 10 – 1 = 9, so then logically I could apply this to everything! This is where number roll was suddenly magical, as the Montessori concept is that before children can gain a meaningful understanding of quantities, numbers, and the relationships between them, they need to learn basic counting, but you should understand what counting means.
In other words, math will make more sense if you can see how the numbers fit together.
This is probably why, when I was a kid, I did my multiplication ‘backwards.’ That is, if you asked me to do 123 x 24, I did it left to right. Let me explain. This is how you probably do it:
123
x 24
----
492
246
----
2952
Right? You start with the bottom right, so you go “4 times 3 is 12, carry the 1, 4 times 2 is 8 plus one is 9, 4 times 1 is 4.” Most people I know would call this ‘traditional’ math. My math goes left to right, so I get this:
123
x 24
----
24
48
72
----
2952
1 x 24, then 2 x 24, and finally 3 x 24. I can do this fast because I’ve memorized my times tables, but at one point a friend asked me how this was really left to right, because when you look at 3 x 24, you’re back to the old “3 times 4 is 12, carry the 1. 3 times 2 is 6 plus 1 is 7.” Well, when I do ALL all the work, it looks like this:
123
x 24
----
2000 (100 x 20)
400 (100 x 4)
400 (20 x 20)
80 (20 x 4)
60 (3 x 20)
12 (3 x 4)
----
2952
The difference really is I’m breaking apart multiplication into smaller addition steps. And now it makes sense to a lot more people. “100 times 20 is 2000” and so on. Once it’s spread out, it’s easier for someone new to pick up how I did it, and in a sense, why. It’s true left to right, all the way down. I don’t generally do long-form math this way any more, though, because like everyone else I had to learn the ‘real’ way of doing it, but also I started to memorize the patterns. I know without really thinking that 12 times 2 is 48. It’s a common enough equation that I memorized the answer.
That means I can do all this in that even faster way you saw above. I just know that since 1 times anything is itself, the 4 from 24 goes under the one. Sometimes I have to remember to mark my place, if I’m doing less frequently combined numbers (I don’t seem to use 7s times 9s a lot). When that happens, I usually add on the zeros:
123
x 24
----
2400
480
72
----
2952
When I don’t, to make sure I keep my place, I go far left top to far right bottom, since those two have to line up. That means I know the “1 times 4” answer (4) has to be under the 1, and the “1 times 2” answer (2) is one to the left. But that’s the advantage of understanding how all the numbers work together, and sets. I know how certain numbers combine, I’ve memorized their patterns, and I can apply them backwards and forwards not because I know the equations, but because I see the pattern.
Now on to the rather controversial image I posted recently:
New Math
This shows you two ways to solve a problem. First is the ‘traditional’ way, or as I’ll call it, the fast way:
32
- 12
----
20
At it’s heart, this is a simple equation. Most of you went “Sure, 3 minus 1 is 2, the 2’s are the same, so 20.” Some of you went “1 plus 2 is 3, so it’s a 2…” Both are correct. Then you get the ‘new’ way:
When I saw this math problem, the first thing I did was the same as you “Why 15!? What?” I mean, we’ve all been told “Show your work, don’t pull numbers out of thin air!” Then I thought back to when I was a kid trying to understand this whole math thing. Fives were easy to remember: 5 10 15 20. It’s either a 0 or a 5, and the number in front went up by 1 every 0. We all kind of got that pretty fast. Number Roll (see?) taught me that concept really early on. That was my lightbulb moment.
“OH! We’re adding X to 12 to get to the 5s, then we add Y to get to the tens, then Z to get to the base of 32 (30), and add the leftovers Q. Add up X, Z, Y, and Q, you get 20!”
This is what I would call “the long way” however the thought occurred to me that this was a number roll-less way to try and teach children how numbers came together! Common Core (which is where this comes from) is actually sneak-teaching kids algebra, while at the same time giving them a reference for that rote memorization they had earlier. You remember your 5 times tables? This is how we use that information in a practical application!
Part of the difference comes in if you think about subtraction as ‘Something new’ or ‘backwards addition.’ I tend to think of it as backwards addition, and multiplication is ‘Faster addition’ (division is ‘faster backwards addition’). I was fairly young when I realized that all math was really, at it’s heart, the same, it was just the formula you slapped in to make it messy. Everything comes down to adding for me, always. We’re all just playing fast ways to do things and solve problems, and this is starting with the long way first.
All this comes back to what Richard Feynman wrote in the essay New Textbooks for the “New” mathematics:
If we would like to, we can and do say, ‘The answer is a whole number less than 9 and bigger than 6,’ but we do not have to say, ‘The answer is a member of the set which is the intersection of the set of those numbers which is larger than 6 and the set of numbers which are smaller than 9’ … In the ‘new’ mathematics, then, first there must be freedom of thought; second, we do not want to teach just words; and third, subjects should not be introduced without explaining the purpose or reason, or without giving any way in which the material could be really used to discover something interesting. I don’t think it is worth while teaching such material.
It’s his third point that I believe Common Core is trying to address. How many of you were taught the purpose of your times tables, after all? How many of you understood the reason besides ‘so I can pass the class’ that we learned to think of numbers and how they were put together? A lot of people seem to think that Feynman didn’t like kids to learn the application of math, to understand what it meant, but that’s incorrect. He rallied against new math because it lacked word problems and applications of use! Yes, you hated those word problems, but they were meant to teach you application. Instead most people learned how to pick out the important bits and do the math as a simple formula to which they could apply that rote memorization.
There’s a problem with this, though, and Common Core has the same problem that New Math does and that the ‘traditional’ way did back when I was a kid, so this is nothing new. It forces kids to learn in one way, and one way only. I was incredibly lucky in that my father let me do math my own way (he found it interesting), and once I showed my work (see above) he and my teachers saw that I had in fact achieved the absolute goal of number roll: I internalized the connection between math equations and the numbers.
Rote memorization has a place. You memorize the tables, you can do math faster, and things like calculus will be surprisingly easier to you because all you have to do is put the numbers into the formula. At the same time, some of the other concepts will be a struggle because you don’t get the connections, you only know memorization and implementation.
I will note that once you’ve memorized this stuff, it’s all a lot faster. I tend to count on my fingers when I’m trying to math days of the week (like today is the 5th, so next Wednesday is 12th) because I’m messing with names (Wednesday) and numbers, and then I have to remember how many days are in March, but I can do all this in my head, including calculating tax. And no, I don’t think it’s ‘cheating’ to use a calculator. The point is understanding what the relationships between the numbers are, knowing what formula to apply when and where, and enjoy it.
That was the goal of New Math, you know. To make math something kids wanted to do. You should read Feynman’s “Surely you’re joking, Mr. Feynman!” and follow his account of being on the board to set up these new curriculums, and you’ll see exactly why they continue to fail over and over. It’s a pity, too, since I bet some kids are looking at the Core method and there’s a lightbulb going on over their heads. I hope parents aren’t scaring their own kids off math because the adults don’t understand this new stuff.
Of course, a lot of this is the fault of the school system, in that the parents aren’t taught what the kids are learning or why. If you’re learning something at school, and at home your parents go “What? This is bullshit!” you’re going to have a harder time learning and accepting. Don’t believe me? Creationism. You’re welcome. The point being you have to reinforce what a kid learns at school in the home or they have to come to terms with the dichotomy of difference at a stage when they don’t understand enough of the world to get what that meant.
Not that having multiple choices is great for every kid. Some people freak out when there’s more than one right answer, especially in math which in the beginning is remarkably straightforward (like spelling). There’s one right answer, but now you’re giving them multiple paths (spelling has this too, by the by: color, colour; grey, gray). It breaks brains. This, perhaps, is a little bit why WordPress is “Decisions, not options.” Maybe we’re giving people the options too soon, but when it comes to learning, we adults should already know there isn’t one ‘right’ way to learn and master skills. And with math, there isn’t going to be one perfect way to get those base concepts into their minds.
We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising, and analytics partners.
